Venezuela

No War Venezuela

The U.S. is orchestrating a coup in Venezuela that is likely to lead to bloodshed — even civil war. Instead of meddling in the internal affairs of another country, the U.S. should be supporting peaceful dialogue facilitated by mediators such as Mexico, Uruguay, and the Pope. We have seen the effects of past U.S. backed coups in Latin America — Guatemala in 1953, Chile in 1973, Honduras in 2009. It always turns out disastrous for the people — as is evidenced by people fleeing U.S.-orchestrated violence across Latin America and seeking refuge at the U.S.-Mexico border.

New Update! We have huge, exciting news about the Venezuelan Embassy! The governments of Venezuela and Turkey have just agreed to sign a Protecting Power Agreement to sustain the Venezuelan Embassy in Washington, DC under the charge of the Turkish government. But in order for this to happen, the State Department must give its stamp of approval. Add your name now to our petition urging the State Department to approve the Turkish Government to operate as the Protecting Power for the Venezuelan embassy in DC.

Tell your Senators: Prohibit unauthorized military force in Venezuela and support S.J. Res. 11 and H.R. 10041

it is imperative Congress show opposition to unilateral military action by the president without prior Congressional authorization.


Click here to tell the Media to Report Venezuela Accurately!

Tell the New York Times, CNN, and MSNBC not to collaborate with the Trump-Abrams-Bolton PR stunt to weaponize humanitarian aid in order to foment violence for their coup on Venezuela. Tell them they have a responsibility to report accurately and truthfully.


Learn more!

Videos

Two Brothers on Opposing Sides in Venezuela’s Political Conflict

The Struggle against Sanctions: The Case of Venezuela

Venezuela Community builds Solidarity Pharmacy to Counter US Sanctions

Social Media

@EndVenezuelaSanctions

Media Resources

Venezuelanalysis.com

OrinocoTribune.com

CEPR.net (highly recommend CEPR’s daily Latin American News Roundup - LANR)

Resource Documents

The Campaign to End US and Canada Sanctions Against Venezuela

Activist Toolbox(Reference: Campaign Resource Documents File)

Economic Sanctions as Collective Punishment

Unilateral Sanctions and International Law

UN Report

English language version of the government's response to the UNHCR draft:

Alfred de Zayas' Human Rights Corner

The Gray Zone

Recent Articles

The Strength of Women:  Venezuelan Commune Members Facing the Blockade

Trump Doesn’t Have Time for Starving Venezuelans

Barbados PM Welcomes Venezuela dialogue, Rejects Intervention Attempts

German ambassador allowed to return to Venezuela

US sanctions 'suffocating' ordinary Venezuelans

Bachelet: “Sanctions Against Venezuela are Exacerbating the Political Crisis”

Unilateral Coercive Measures as Weapons of Modern Warfare – The Venezuelan Case

Over 40 Groups Call on Congress to Oppose Sanctions, Military Intervention 

Projects

Embassy Protectors Defense Committee

North American Anti-Sanctions Resolution (sample)

City Council of Berkeley

Railroad Workers United

Venezuela Crisis: FAQs

1. Why is there an economic crisis in Venezuela?

Venezuela relies upon its oil sales for its external revenue. Oil prices have collapsed over the past decades. This has meant that Venezuela’s ability to import goods — including food and medicines — has been compromised by lack of foreign exchange.

US economic sanctions have harshly curtailed Venezuela’s ability to raise funds to upgrade its oil sector and to raise funds to diversify its economy (to grow food, for instance). These sanctions have also hurt Venezuela’s ability to use its off-shore refining capacity to add value to the crude oil that it extracts from the ground. US and Canadian companies have been suing Venezuela’s oil firm for broken contracts. They have used Venezuela’s weakness to plunder the oil firm by attacking its inability to honour contracts made when oil prices were higher.

The Venezuelan government used all kinds of mechanisms — many of which failed — to raise funds to prevent a wholesale collapse of the economy. The crisis provoked by collapsed oil prices and by the economic sanctions as well as the difficulties of controlling the situation has led to hyperinflation in the country and general economic instability. Corruption exists in Venezuela, as it exists elsewhere, but it is not the author of the economic crisis. The authors are the lowered price of oil, the devastation of the economic sanctions and the difficulties of raising finance to overcome this situation.

2. Is there an acute humanitarian crisis in Venezuela?

The United Nations’ Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order Alfred De Zayas – an American lawyer — said on February 20, 2018: ‘I have compared the statistics of Venezuela with that of other countries and there is no humanitarian crisis. Of course, there is scarcity, anxiety and shortages but those who have worked for decades for the United Nations know the situation of countries in Asia, Africa and some in the Americas. They know that the situation in Venezuela is not a humanitarian crisis’.

Certainly, there are undernourished people in Venezuela. The UN’s Food and Agricultural Organisation says that 11.7% of the people of Venezuela are undernourished. This compares with 23.2% of the people in Sub-Saharan Africa who are undernourished and 31.4% of people from Eastern Africa. Closer to Venezuela, 16.5% of the people of the Caribbean suffer from undernourishment. This is a problem of poverty and of the unequal relations in the world between the North and the South. Poverty rates in Venezuela have dropped since the 1990s, but hunger has not been erased.

3. Has the Government of Venezuela done anything to alleviate hunger?

The government of Venezuela has pushed at least two programmes to tackle the problem of hunger:

  1. Comité Local de Abastecimiento y Producción (CLAP). The Local Committees for Supply and Production is made up of local neighbourhood groups who grow food and who receive food from agricultural producers. They distribute this food to about six million families at very low cost. Currently, the CLAP boxes are being sent to households every 15 days.
  2. Plan de Atención a la Vulnerabilidad Nutriocional. The most vulnerable of Venezuelans — 620,000 of them — receive assistance. The National Institute of Nutrition has been coordinating the delivery of food to a majority of the country’s municipalities.

These are two of a series of programmes by the government to tackle the problem of hunger in the country.

4. Has the Government of Venezuela Refused Foreign Aid?

The Government of Venezuela has been in contact with the International Committee of the Red Cross, the United Nations (notably the Food and Agriculture Organisation) and the World Health Organisation to coordinate receipt of medical aid and food aid as well as finance for longer-term agricultural projects. Already, the World Health Organisation and the Pan-American Health Organisation have delivered more than 50 tonnes of medical supplies to Venezuela in 2018.

Venezuela’s Government has been open to non-political delivery of aid. There is no question of being insular when it comes to the economic crisis created by the fall of oil prices and the US-driven economic war.

5. Is the US ‘aid’ humanitarian or is it a pretext for regime change?

The United States has historically used ‘humanitarian aid’ as a pretext for regime change. This is precisely the formula used against the Government of the Dominican Republic in 1965. The Organisation of American States backed that invasion (and the use of humanitarianism as a pretext); fifty years later, it apologised for that act. In the 1980s, Elliot Abrams – the man tasked by US President Donald Trump to manage the Venezuela file – openly used humanitarian shipments to Central America to smuggle in weapons. It is the United States that has made ‘humanitarian aid’ into a political matter.

It is because the US has made ‘humanitarian aid’ into a political weapon that the International Committee of the Red Cross’ Dominik Stillhart said on 1 February 2019 that whatever plans that US officials ‘have to help the people of Venezuela, it has to be shielded from this political conversation. We are not an implementing agency for any donor, specifically not to implement things that have a political tone’.

The US has promised $20 million in aid. At the same time, the US sanctions have cost Venezuela $23 billion in 2018. Furthermore, the US Government is trying to seize $20 billion in Venezuelan assets. The Bank of London has already taken $1.2 billion in gold that the Venezuelans own. Venezuela has lost billions of dollars as a result of Western policy. The $20 million aid packet is a humiliating gesture in comparison.

Furthermore, the $20 million aid would purchase 60 tonnes of food. The CLAP scheme by the Government of Venezuela by itself delivers 50,000 tonnes of food per months to needy Venezuelans.

The US has used military aircraft to bring in this modest aid, driven it to a warehouse and then said that the Venezuelans are not prepared to open an unused bridge for it. The entire process is political theatre. US Senator Marco Rubio went to that bridge — which has not been very open — to say in a threatening way that the aid ‘is going to get through’ to Venezuela one way or another. These are words that threaten the sovereignty of Venezuela and build up the energy for a military attack. There is nothing humanitarian here.

6. Why has the Venezuelan government arrested its opponents?

The Government of Venezuela has allowed the opposition to continue to hold its protests and to organise openly. It has not shut down any of the media outlets that continue to take a position against the president and his government.

On the other hand, the Government of Venezuela has arrested people who have been involved in the assassination attempt against Nicholás Maduro and those who have been involved in the armed attacks by the opposition that have been going on for the past two years. Leopoldo Lopez, for instance, was arrested for inciting violence in 2014. Judge Susana Barreiros found Lopez guilty based on – among other things — 700 tweets that called for his supporters in the movement known as La Salida (The Exit) to go on the streets and wreak havoc. The violence led to the death of 43 people, most of them bystanders and security personnel. In court, Lopez said to Barreiros, ‘You are more afraid to read out the sentence than I am to hear it" — a threat that should have earned him more jail time. Two years ago, the courts decided to move Lopez to house arrest, where he is serving the rest of his thirteen-year sentence.

Should the Government of Venezuela not prosecute a citizen who openly calls for violence and then celebrates when his party members act violently (including killing people)?

Open Letter To The UN Secretary General & High Commissioner For Human Rights

To The United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and The High Commissioner For Human Rights Michelle Bachelet

From Alfred de Zayas, 23 February 2019

D0G2_k0WoAA7IX9.png-large.pngDear Michelle Bachelet and Antonio Guterres:

As former UN Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order (2012-2018), I would like to urge you to once again make your voices heard and make concrete proposals for mediation and peace in the context of the Venezuelan crisis.

The most noble task of the United Nations is to create the conditions conducive to local, regional and international peace, to work preventively and tirelessly to avoid armed conflicts, to mediate and negotiate to reach peaceful solutions, so that all human beings can live in human dignity and in the enjoyment of the human right to peace and all other civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights.  I am particularly worried by the Orwellian corruption of language, the instrumentalization and weaponization of human rights and now even of humanitarian assistance.

I look back at my UN mission to Venezuela in November/December 2017 as a modest contribution to facilitate the cooperation between the United Nations and the Venezuelan government and to open the door to the visits of other rapporteurs.  See my report to the UN Human Rights Council and the relevant recommendations.

I believe that it would be timely and necessary for both of you to issue a statement reaffirming General Assembly Resolutions 2625 and 3314 and the 23 Principles of International Order that I formulated in my 2018 report to the Human Rights Council.  See para 14.

It would be appropriate to recognize the fact that the government of Venezuela has put into effect some of the recommendations contained in my report -- and in the six-page confidential memo that I personally gave to Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza upon my departure. 

Indeed, first the Venezuelan government released 80 detainees -- including Roberto Picón and 23 others whose release I had specifically requested -- that was on 23 December 2017, followed by other releases in the course of 2018.  Alas, there has been practically no information about this in the mainstream media, although it is easily accessible on the internet.  See also the comments of Venezuela on my report, in particular, paragraph 46:

(xvi) As a result of this on 23 December 2017, 80 people arrested for acts of violence during the protests in the country were released; and on 1 June 2018, 39 more people were released.

and paragraph 46:

(xviii) In this regard, the Venezuelan Government values the willingness and disposition of the Independent Expert, who was pleased to inform the competent authorities of the requests he received from some relatives of the persons deprived of their liberty. His recommendations were accepted.

Shortly after my visit Venezuelan authorities met with the UN agencies and made additional cooperation accords, thanks to the valuable efforts Peter Grohmann, the UNDP representative in Caracas.

Now the government of Venezuela has formally asked the United Nations for humanitarian assistance in connection with the current crisis.  We must not let them down.

I think that the US should turn over all the humanitarian assistance and medical supplies it has flown into Colombia and have them distributed as soon as possible with the help of the United Nations and other neutral organizations, including the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Another item of information that is sorely missing from the mainstream media is the delivery last week of 933 tons of food and medicines at port La Guaira -- coming from China, Cuba, India, Turkey etc

Moreover an additional 300 tons of medicines and medical supplies provided by Russia arrived by air.

As I know from my conversations with Venezuelan ministers during my visit in 2017 and the recent conversations I have had with Venezuelan Ambassador to the UN in Geneva Jorge Valero --

Venezuela has always welcomed and repeatedly asked for assistance from neutral and friendly governments so as to overcome the adverse human rights impacts of the financial blockade and the sanctions. Such help should be offered in good faith, without strings attached.

I believe that this is the moment for Michelle Bachelet to accept the invitation of the government of Venezuela, extended to her in December 2018, to visit Venezuela personally.  Her presence in Venezuela should ban the growing danger of a military intervention by foreign entities. She should endorse the efforts at mediation launched by Mexico and Uruguay at the Montevideo mechanism.

There are ominous parallels with the run-up to the Iraq invasion in 2003 -- an illegal war, as Kofi Annan said on repeated occasions.

It is obvious to any first-year law student that the constant threats against Venezuela are contrary to article 2(4) of the UN 'Charter.  What many do not realize is that the threats, the economic war, the financial blockade and the sanctions violate the principles contained in Article 3 of the OAS Charter:

“Every State has the right to choose, without external interference, its political, economic, and social system and to organize itself in the way best suited to it, and has the duty to abstain from intervening in the affairs of another State. Subject to the foregoing, the American States shall cooperate fully among themselves, independently of the nature of their political, economic, and social systems; f. The American States condemn war of aggression: victory does not give rights; g. An act of aggression against one American State is an act of aggression against all the other American States; h. Controversies of an international character arising between two or more American States shall be settled by peaceful procedures; I. Social justice and social security are bases of lasting peace…”

Moreover, they violate numerous articles of Chapter 4 of the OAS Charter, Article 17:

Each State has the right to develop its cultural, political, and economic life freely and naturally. In this free development, the State shall respect the rights of the individual and the principles of universal morality.

Article 18:

Respect for and the faithful observance of treaties constitute standards for the development of peaceful relations among States. International treaties and agreements should be public.

Article 19:

No State or group of States has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other State. The foregoing principle prohibits not only armed force but also any other form of interference or attempted threat against the personality of the State or against its political, economic, and cultural elements.

Article 20:

No State may use or encourage the use of coercive measures of an economic or political character in order to force the sovereign will of another State and obtain from it advantages of any kind.”

Dear Michelle Bachelet, dear Antonio Guterres:

The world looks up to you in the hope that you can avert even greater suffering to the peoples of Venezuela.  They need international Solidarity. (Draft Declaration Right International Solidarity)

I remain respectfully yours

Professor Dr. Alfred de Zayas, Geneva School of Diplomacy

FAQs on the Venezuelan Embassy Protection Collective in D.C.

What’s going on at the Venezuelan Embassy in D.C?

TIMELINE:

  • On March 18, 2019 representatives of Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaidó appropriated Venezuela’s military attaché building in Washington D.C. and consulate in New York City and announced plans to take over the D.C. embassy. Determined to avoid another U.S. war, a group of US peace activists, including CODEPINK, sought and received permission from the legitimate Venezuelan government to form an Embassy Protection Collective.

  • On April 10 we moved into the four-story embassy in the Georgetown neighborhood sleeping on sofas and floors to maintain our presence. At first, the Venezuelan diplomats were still working in the building, but they were all ordered by the State Department to leave the country by April 25. Since then, we have been holding the embassy so that a diplomatic solution can be worked out similar to the situation with Iran, where U.S. Interests Section in Tehran has been operating under the Swiss Embassy and the Iranian Interests Section in Washington DC is operating under the Pakistani Embassy.

  • On April 30, when a group of Guaidó supporters — almost coinciding with his call for an uprising inside Venezuela — descended on the embassy, determined to oust us and seize the building. They came banging pots and pans, blaring piercing sirens, horns and megaphones. They have used lasers to flash into our eyes at night while banging menacingly on the doors with sledgehammers. They plastered their own signs all over the building.

  • On May 8, Potomac Electric Power Company (Pepco), assisted by the Secret Service, cut electricity and water to the embassy building despite all utility bills being paid in full. Despite all of this, the activists inside, including CODEPINK’s Paki Weiland, remain strong and resolute they will remain inside the embassy to protect it for as long as it takes.

What is at stake if the Venezuelan Embassy gets turned over to Juan Guaidó, how might it affect the situation in Venezuela?

Many scenarios could ignite a war with Venezuela, including a fight over embassies. The United States and Venezuela broke diplomatic ties on Jan. 23, when Guaidó declared himself interim president and the Trump administration immediately recognized him. Diplomats in both capitals vacated their embassies, leaving skeletal staff but keeping the buildings intact. Then on March 18, Guaidó’s representatives in the United States escalated the tensions by appropriating Venezuela’s military attaché building in Washington and the consulate in New York City, while announcing plans to take over the D.C. embassy.

A takeover of the embassy of a sovereign nation whose government holds power and is recognized by the United Nations would be an illegal act. According to the 1961 Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic Relations, diplomatic premises are inviolable and the receiving State must protect the premises against any “intrusion, disturbance of the peace or impairment of its dignity.” If the Trump administration succeeds in giving the Washington D.C, embassy to Guaidó, via expelling the activists lawfully living inside the embassy, the Maduro government would likely reciprocate by taking over the U.S. Embassy in Caracas. This could be just what warhawks John Bolton and Elliot Abrams are looking for as a justification for a US military intervention.

Are we denying Venezuelans consular services inside the embassy?

Juan Guaidó’ has zero legitimacy inside Venezuela. As such, if his representatives take over the embassy in D.C, they will not be able to issue passports, extend visas, or perform any other consular services. The only way to reinstate consular services at the embassy is for a diplomatic solution to be worked out with the Maduro government.

Do we support of the Maduro government?

The Embassy Protection Collective is comprised of individuals and organizations with various opinions about the Maduro government —some pro, some neutral, some sceptical — but we are all determined to stop U.S. intervention.

Can food and/or medicine get into the embassy building?

The Secret Service has put out a public statement saying that no individuals, medicine or food have been prevented from entering the building — this is entirely untrue! Every entrance to the building is blocked by opponents who refuse to let people, food, medicine, or supplies. The Secret Service does nothing to stop the opponents from blocking the entrances and the Secret Service themselves are even blocking the driveway entrance where food and supplies could otherwise get in. When supporters of the activists inside have tried to bring food, they have been arrested. This was the case of CODEPINK’s Ariel Gold who, finding all entrances blocked, threw bread into an empty platform outside a door and was arrested for “throwing missiles.” Even packages sent by the US Postal Service are not allowed in, which is a federal offense. On occasion, we have been able to tie a package to a rope to send food up through a window. This involves doing so quickly before being attacked by the opposition or police. On one occasion when we were able to pulley things in through a window, three of us were physically assaulted and despite clear video evidence, the police refused to arrest our attacker.

What is the legal status of the activists inside the embassy?

International Law Protects Foreign Embassies located in The United States. According to Article 22 of the 1961 Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic Relations, foreign embassies should be protected by the United States government and their space should not be violated by the US government. Specifically, international law requires:

  1. The premises of the mission shall be inviolable. The agents of the receiving State may not enter them, except with the consent of the head of the mission.
  2. The receiving State is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises of the mission against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the mission or impairment of its dignity.
  3. The premises of the mission, their furnishings and other property thereon and the means of transport of the mission shall be immune from search, requisition, attachment or execution.

The Trump Administration would be violating the Vienna Convention if it allowed the illegal seizure of the Venezuela embassy. The Election Protection Collective is supporting the people of Venezuela by taking responsibility to ensure that Article 22 of the Vienna Convention is not violated.

What is it like for people inside the building?

Our people inside are without sufficient food and other critical supplies and without water or electricity. They are not allowed to freely exit and enter the building. They sleep at night with a terrible sense of insecurity, worried that the angry mob will break in and attack. But we —those of us on the inside and those of us supporting them on the outside — remain resolute and we demand that our government respect U.S. and international law. The Secret Service must protect the Embassy and the people who are lawfully on embassy property until the two governments come to an agreement about their properties. At that time, the Embassy Protection Collective will happily leave the embassy, happy because we can go back to our lives but happy, most of all, because we will have helped to give John Bolton and Elliot Abrams one less reason to drag our nation into another war. 

What is the backgrounder to the Venezuela Crisis?

Please click here for more FAQs about the crisis in Venezuela.

Related Campaigns

  • protectingpower

    Dear Secretary Mike Pompeo, We are encouraged to learn that on May 21, the Venezuelan and Turkish governments have agreed to sign a Protecting Power Agreement that would...
    Sign now!
  • No US intervention in Venezuela

    Overseas supporters can sign this Petition:  Dear Congress, The U.S. has a long and sordid history of supporting coups in Latin America — Guatemala in 1953, Chile in...
    Sign now!
  • U.S. Media: Report Venezuela Accurately!

    OVERSEAS SUPPORTERS CAN SIGN THIS PETITION Dear New York Times, CNN, and MSNBC, The U.S. has a long and sordid history of supporting coups in Latin America —...
    Sign now!

Related Events

No events yet.

Related News


Aug 29
Filed under: Venezuela

Mother’s Day in Caracas

Teri Mattson (right) with Paki Wieland during the Embassy Protection Collective delegation to Venezuela this year.
Read more

Aug 13
Filed under: Venezuela

US Observers Just Returned from Venezuela Available for Interviews

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS CONTACT: Teri Mattson: teri@codepink.org | 415.259.9626 Paki Wieland: pakiwieland@gmail.com | 413.695.1877
Read more


May 16
Filed under: Venezuela

CODEPINK Denounces Illegal Entry and Arrest at DC Venezuelan Embassy and Vows to Keep FIghting to Protect the Embassy

Contact persons:   Medea Benjamin | CODEPINK co-director | 415-235-6517 | medea.benjamin@gmail.com Ariel Gold | CODEPINK co-director | 520 599 5330 | ariel@codepink.org
Read more


May 09
Filed under: Venezuela

Emergency at Venezuelan Embassy, D.C.: Activists Demand Electricity and Water Be Turned Back On — Press Conference 1pm Today, May 9

  Media Advisory: May 9, 2019 Contact: Ariel Gold, 510-559-5330  |  Medea Benjamin 415-235-6517 Emergency at Venezuelan Embassy, D.C.: Activists Demand Electricity and Water Be Turned...
Read more


Sign up to Workgroup