Why Aren’t Americans Rising Up Like We Are Seeing Across the Planet?

By Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J. S. Davies

The waves of protests breaking out in country after country around the world beg the question: Why aren’t Americans rising up in peaceful protest like our neighbors? We live at the very heart of this neoliberal system that is force-feeding the systemic injustice and inequality of 19th-century laissez-faire capitalism to the people of the 21st century. So we are subject to many of the same abuses that have fueled mass protest movements in other countries, including high rents, stagnant wages, cradle-to-grave debt, ever-rising economic inequality, privatized health care, a shredded social safety net, abysmal public transportation, systemic political corruption and endless war.

We also have a corrupt, racist billionaire as president, who Congress may soon impeach, but where are the masses outside the White House, banging pots and pans to drive Trump out? Why aren’t people crashing the offices of their congresspeople, demanding that they represent the people or resign? If none of these conditions has so far provoked a new American revolution, what will it take to trigger one?

In the 1960s and 1970s, the senseless Vietnam War provoked a serious, well-organized antiwar movement. But today the U.S.’s endless wars just rage on in the background of our lives, as the U.S. and its allies kill and mutilate men, women and children in distant countries, day after day, year after year. Our history has also witnessed inspiring mass movements for civil rights, women’s rights and gay rights, but these movements are much tamer today.

The Occupy Movement in 2011 came closest to challenging the entire neoliberal system. It awakened a new generation to the reality of government of, by, and for the corrupt 1 percent, and built a powerful basis for solidarity among the marginalized 99 percent. But Occupy lost momentum because it failed to transition from a rallying point and a decentralized, democratic forum to a cohesive movement that could impact the existing power structure.

The climate movement is starting to mobilize a new generation, and groups like School Strike for the Climate and Extinction Rebellion take direct aim at this destructive economic system that prioritizes corporate growth and profits over the very survival of life on Earth. But while climate protests have shut down parts of London and other cities around the world, the scale of climate protests in the U.S. does not yet match the urgency of the crisis.

So why is the American public so passive?

Americans pour their energy and hopes into electoral campaigns. Election campaigns in most countries last only a few months, with strict limits on financing and advertising to try to ensure fair elections. But Americans pour millions of hours and billions of dollars into multi-year election campaigns run by an ever-growing sector of the commercial advertising industry, which even awarded Barack Obama its “Marketer of the Year” award for 2008. (The other finalists were not John McCain or the Republicans but Apple, Nike and Coors beer.)

When U.S. elections are finally over, thousands of exhausted volunteers sweep up the bunting and go home, believing their work is done. While electoral politics should be a vehicle for change, this neoliberal model of corporate “center-right” and “center-left” politics ensures that congresspeople and presidents of both parties are primarily accountable to the ruling 1 percent who “pay to play.”

Former President Jimmy Carter has bluntly described what Americans euphemistically call “campaign finance” as a system of legalized bribery. Transparency International (TI) ranks the U.S. 22nd on its political corruption index, identifying it as more corrupt than any other wealthy, developed country.

Without a mass movement continually pushing and prodding for real change and holding politicians accountable—for their policies as well as their words—our neoliberal rulers assume that they can safely ignore the concerns and interests of ordinary people as they make the critical decisions that shape the world we live in. As Frederick Douglass observed in 1857, “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”

Millions of Americans have internalized the myth of the “American dream,” believing they have exceptional chances for social and economic mobility compared with their peers in other countries. If they aren’t successful, it must be their own fault—either they’re not smart enough or they don’t work hard enough.

The American Dream is not just elusive—it’s a complete fantasy. In reality, the U.S. has the greatest income inequality of any wealthy, developed country. Of the 39 developed countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), only South Africa and Costa Rica exceed the U.S.’s 18 percent poverty rate. The United States is an anomaly: a very wealthy country suffering from exceptional poverty. To make matters worse, children born into poor families in the U.S. are more likely to remain poor as adults than poor children in other wealthy countries. But the American dream ideology keeps people struggling and competing to improve their lives on a strictly individual basis, instead of demanding a fairer society and the health care, education and public services we all need and deserve.

The corporate media keeps Americans uninformed and docile. The U.S.’s corporate media system is also unique, both in its consolidated corporate ownership and in its limited news coverage, endlessly downsized newsrooms and narrow range of viewpoints. Its economics reporting reflects the interests of its corporate owners and advertisers; its domestic reporting and debate are strictly framed and limited by the prevailing rhetoric of Democratic and Republican leaders; its anemic foreign policy coverage is editorially dictated by the State Department and Pentagon.

This closed media system wraps the public in a cocoon of myths, euphemisms and propaganda to leave us exceptionally ignorant about our own country and the world we live in. Reporters Without Borders ranks the U.S. 48th out of 180 countries on its Press Freedom Index, once again making the U.S. an exceptional outlier among wealthy countries.

It’s true that people can search for their own truth on social media to counter the corporate babble, but social media is itself a distraction. People spend countless hours on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other platforms venting their anger and frustration without getting up off the couch to actually do something—except perhaps sign a petition. “Clicktivism” will not change the world.

Add to this the endless distractions of Hollywood, video games, sports and consumerism, and the exhaustion that comes with working several jobs to make ends meet. The resulting political passivity of Americans is not some strange accident of American culture but the intended product of a mutually reinforcing web of economic, political and media systems that keep the American public confused, distracted and convinced of our own powerlessness.

The political docility of the American public does not mean that Americans are happy with the way things are, and the unique challenges this induced docility poses for American political activists and organizers surely cannot be more daunting than the life-threatening repression faced by activists in Chile, Haiti or Iraq.

So how can we liberate ourselves from our assigned roles as passive spectators and mindless cheerleaders for a venal ruling class that is laughing all the way to the bank and through the halls of power as it grabs ever more concentrated wealth and power at our expense?

Few expected a year ago that 2019 would be a year of global uprising against the neoliberal economic and political system that has dominated the world for 40 years. Few predicted new revolutions in Chile or Iraq or Algeria. But popular uprisings have a way of confounding conventional wisdom.

The catalysts for each of these uprisings have also been surprising. The protests in Chile began over an increase in subway fares. In Lebanon, the spark was a proposed tax on WhatsApp and other social media accounts. Hikes in fuel tax triggered the yellow vest protests in France, while the ending of fuel subsidies was a catalyst in both Ecuador and Sudan.

The common factor in all these movements is the outrage of ordinary people at systems and laws that reward corruption, oligarchy and plutocracy at the expense of their own quality of life. In each country, these catalysts were the final straws that broke the camel’s back, but once people were in the street, protests quickly turned into more general uprisings demanding the resignation of leaders and governments.

They have the guns but we have the numbers. State repression and violence have only fueled greater popular demands for more fundamental change, and millions of protesters in country after country have remained committed to non-violence and peaceful protest—in stark contrast to the rampant violence of the right-wing coup in Bolivia.

While these uprisings seem spontaneous, in every country where ordinary people have risen up in 2019, activists have been working for years to build the movements that eventually brought large numbers of people onto the streets and into the headlines.

Erica Chenoweth’s research on the history of nonviolent protest movements found that whenever at least 3.5 percent of a population have taken to the streets to demand political change, governments have been unable to resist their demands. Here in the U.S., Transparency International found that the number of Americans who see “direct action,” including street protests, as the antidote to our corrupt political system has risen from 17 percent to 25 percent since Trump took office, far more than Chenoweth’s 3.5 percent. Only 28 percent still see simply “voting for a clean candidate” as the answer. So maybe we are just waiting for the right catalyst to strike a chord with the American public.

In fact, the work of progressive activists in the U.S. is already upsetting the neoliberal status quo. Without the movement-building work of thousands of Americans, Bernie Sanders would still be a little-known senator from Vermont, largely ignored by the corporate media and the Democratic Party. Sanders’ wildly successful first presidential campaign in 2016 pushed a new generation of American politicians to commit to real policy solutions to real problems instead of the vague promises and applause lines that serve as smokescreens for the corrupt agendas of neoliberal politicians like Trump and Biden.

We can’t predict exactly what catalyst will trigger a mass movement in the U.S. like the ones we are seeing overseas, but with more and more Americans, especially young people, demanding an alternative to a system that doesn’t serve their needs, the tinder for a revolutionary movement is everywhere. We just have to keep kicking up sparks until one catches fire.


Medea Benjamin, co-founder of CODEPINK for Peace, is the author of several books, including Inside Iran: The Real History and Politics of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Kingdom of the Unjust: Behind the U.S.-Saudi Connection.

Nicolas J. S. Davies is an independent journalist, a researcher for CODEPINK, and the author of Blood on Our Hands: The American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq.

Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Kevin VanGoethem
    commented 2019-12-01 09:46:58 -0500
    So sad that an otherwise terrific post has to be tainted with the same old crap, and amazing how some people think that they know all of the problems but have no answers. How is CODEPINK for Peace is preaching revolt? How about CODEPINK for Reform? Make sure your message matches what you claim to be…
  • Bonnie Havens
    commented 2019-11-28 19:18:14 -0500 · Flag
    Why? Because we work paycheck to almost paycheck. We have to work multiple jobs just to survive. Our educational system has been dumbing down the masses for nearly 40 years. People are ill-informed and therefore believe the lies we are told every minute of every day by mass media and on our social feeds. Our smart phones have enslaved us, and imaginary differences espoused by our leaders have divided us. Why don’t we stand up in protest? We can’t. Corporate greed poisons us, mind body and soul. We can no longer see beyond this day’s fight just to breathe with the yokes they have placed around our necks. Why don’t we protest? Really? Our current situation has been decades in the making. It has been a systemized, orchestrated erosion of our values and beliefs as Americans, so we no longer have the will to think for ourselves, let alone stand up and fight for ourselves.
  • Marshall Gwynn
    commented 2019-11-26 03:48:20 -0500
  • Marshall Gwynn
    followed this page 2019-11-26 03:48:14 -0500
  • Ian James
    commented 2019-11-25 10:37:44 -0500
    What a great article. American’s must be exhausted. You have a bizarre system that sees virtual non-stop elections that are won or lost based largely on the amount of money spent with very little regard for the quality of the politician as an effective leader. The rest of the world gets it done in 6 about 6 weeks and all that money stuffing is banned. The author is right on, American citizens are living in a bubble… all 330,000,000 million of them… and it won’t end well when they finally realise the king is naked and the rest of the world has moved on.
  • Elizabeth Everett
    commented 2019-11-23 17:26:15 -0500 · Flag
    What exactly is your alternative to neo-liberalism? Neo-liberalism conquered the world because thinkers such as Ayn Rand, and Milton Friedman, put forth arguments for it that were never refuted by anyone in academia or the media. They just reacted to these ideas with negative emotions. In the end, most of our left-wing and progressive institutions ended up embracing the Greed is good ideology of neo-liberalism. Our universities charge outrageous tuitions, clearly the profs are in it for the money. Unions are all about the Wall Street investments in their pension plans.

    We can get people out to protest neo-liberalism but, are they willing to live in a world without usury and without rule by corporations that are duty bound to maximize profits for their investors? We could create a world like that but, it would be a world without anyone earning any interest on any investment. So, no 401ks or IRAs, no reason to invest in a pension fund because the money would just sit their without earning any interest.

    I went out to Zuccotti Park in the heart of the New York City Financial District, to protest with Occupy Wall Street. Neo-liberal darling Peter Schiff came out carrying a sign saying: “I’m the 1% Let’s Talk”. In just an hour, Schiff had the protesters eating out of his hand, and the majority raised their hand when he asked them if they are pro-capitalist. The whole thing was caught on Reason TV.
  • Emily Chatfield-Lusto
    commented 2019-11-23 16:29:00 -0500
    This is a terrific analysis of the situation as my friends and I have discussed it over the last several years. Many of us do more than click our protests, but taking to the streets and protesting is more than a full time job—and physically exhausting. Moreover, without glimpses of light beyond the rock we are steadily pushing up the hill, it is also emotionally exhausting. We are definitely looking for the right spark or sparks to bring more people out. Thank you.
  • Tin Bell
    commented 2019-11-22 14:40:24 -0500
    We should come together in every city and start protesting for what is right. We do need to get up a do something. I would be happy to. Who is with me?
  • Thurmond Jones
    commented 2019-11-22 06:34:43 -0500
    FUK YOU YOU TRYING TO DIVIDE OUR COUNTRY< MUTHA FUKING BYTCHES KISS MY AZZ
  • Gilson Chapple
    commented 2019-11-21 09:27:30 -0500
    So basically, what this writer is suggesting is socialistic communism?
    If he’s not suggesting it. What change does he actually want to happen? There are not many choices, are there?
  • Jose E Perez-Guzman
    commented 2019-11-21 08:30:55 -0500
    Why? Well, the US experimented their brainwashing techniques in Puerto Rico and other possessions and saw how far those techniques could affect people and for how long. Those techniques are now being applied to the people of the US and they are very successful at it.
  • Diane Peagler
    commented 2019-11-20 19:25:03 -0500
    Have you SEEN… the Rallies. for Sanders!??? Now . if we can get THE MEDIA.. on it.. the crowds would triple!!
  • Oddie Fitz
    commented 2019-11-19 16:22:52 -0500
    Isn’t this clictivism
  • Dan Gilbert
    commented 2019-11-19 12:34:27 -0500
    Maybe its because everything is not as bad as the right would like you to think. In fact whats the problem? Employment and stock market at an all time high. People are able to pay their bills and still have a little something left to enjoy. Really, how has this administration changed your life except for the better. Maybe because your feelings have been hurt? Get over it cupcakes.
  • Michael Jones
    commented 2019-11-19 08:17:36 -0500 · Flag
    My thinking is we only have 1% of the population involved in the many “jungle and sand wars” around the globe. The 1% are the military members and their families. So that means 99% of the population aren’t affected. 43% of the 99% think everything is fine. 55% are wishing they would stop. But, not acting. The final 1% is involved in the “military-industrial complex”, and the War Hawks getting wealthier from the wars. A part of the difference between now and Vietnam is there isn’t a draft that affected a large part of the population. Especially, young people. That was the group that was most affected and the ones that protested. We of the older generation are sitting and thinking the US Government will protect us and handle it. But, that is really not the case. We have a corrupt Presidential administration and a Congress taking so many campaign contributions (bribes) from lobbyists and undercover donors. So nothing is going happen. Americans have always needed an impetus to act. British Taxation, Slavery, Pearl Harbor, and Vietnam. Until a spark shocks everyone. Little is going to happen.
  • Drew Willard
    commented 2019-11-19 02:40:26 -0500
    The ‘beloved community’ is the vision that Martin Luther King, Jr. spoke of as a convergence with the American Dream and God’s kingdom, ‘on Earth as it is in Heaven’ (from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount which provides the floor plan with the Beatitudes – not as a list, but as a counter narrative to violent insurrection). It is the common goal – spoken or not, of the Women’s Movement, #Metoo, Water Protectors, Black Lives Matter/Blue Lives Matter (they’re connected), Parkland Youth against gun violence, earlier Occupy movements, rallies against immigrant bans and the separation of families, and every one of these liberation movements around the world, now. Include the protests against globalisation in Seattle back in 1999, and we have something brewing like 1989 when the Beijing Spring suppression gave way to the Fall of the Wall and the end of the USSR, as well as social transformation in South Africa and Nicaragua… Thousands of years earlier, the 6th Century Revolt against Priestcraft – also called the Axial Age, ushered in the great prophetic religions of Buddhism, Jainism, a reformed Hinduism (Upanishads), the Judaism of Isaiah, Confucianism, Taoism, and the first Greek philosophies. The common denominator of those movements was rational lovingkindness – that it makes sense to be kind.The model is there for what can be as an achievable social reality after revolution, but we have to do our part…
  • John Sibley
    followed this page 2019-11-19 00:18:49 -0500
  • Kim Butler McIntosh
    commented 2019-11-17 11:39:42 -0500
    Erica Chenowith’s research is not founded on true revolution although that’s how she labels it. The American civil rights movement, etc, she cites,improved aspects of the white supremacist, racist, imperialist, capitalist system but did not address the system, itself. Bandaids. Capitalism can’t be legislated into having a conscience. “Neoliberal capitalism for the last 40 years” is not the problem. CAPITALISM is the problem. Sorry, Medea, close but no cigar. Ending capitalism is required and a worldwide working class owned, planned and controlled economic and social system is what it will take for any meaningful change to occur.
  • Jodi Paige
    commented 2019-11-17 02:07:45 -0500
    THANK YOU for publishing this.
    I have wondered the same thing many times;
    WHAT would it take for Americans to take to the street?!? We are now desensitized to Gun violence AND corruption. I think this July 4th in DC for an Independence Day ReDux and demand they resignations of Congress and the presidency. Start Over. No corporate money. 60 day election cycle. The Evolution of the Revolution!
  • Chanell Johnson
    commented 2019-11-16 11:36:25 -0500
    I love this article, I for one have gone to a couple of Bernie sanders speeches and he’s the only candidate I want. But I feel that soon we will uprise I feel like it’s close to collapsing right before our eyes. The one thing that will rush a huge protest would be if they allow trump to stay in office and not move to remove him from office.
  • John Broussard
    commented 2019-11-15 10:09:55 -0500
    Letter to my Congressional Delegation

    HE HAS ME WORRIED

    It is becoming increasingly evident that there is something radically wrong with our President. His long speeches are becoming more and more rambling , more and more confused and confusing, more and more evidence that he is not thinking rationally.
    Now, I want to make it clear. I am not a psychiatrist. I may be completely wrong about what is happening in and to the mind of Donald Trump. However, those far more knowledgeable about mental health than I am are beginning to voice frightening descriptions of what is happening to that mind. Their comments range from “deranged” to “on the point of a complete breakdown.”
    I am aware that diagnosis at a distance is a practice that should be rare on the part of such professionals, but there are very extenuating circumstances in this instance. If the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, who has his fingers only a few inches from the button that could wipe out millions of human beings, is hovering on the brink of complete madness, then I want to know what precautions are being taken for preventing that catastrophic result of his insanity.
    Since you are closer to the workings of our government than I am, I’m asking you to look into those precautions and to make a public statement about the extent to which they may or may not be put into practice should such action become necessary.

    John A. Broussard
    75-181 Hualalai Rd. Apt. #A403
    Kailua-Kona HI 96740

    broupome@hawaii.rr.com